|
E-mail Updates
|
Certified success
Spring 2007
Published: 02 April, 2007
In the first of a series of articles on timber environmental certification schemes, Rupert Oliver looks at the Programme for Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) The PEFC is currently the world’s largest forest certification network. It’s scheme for providing assurance that wood products derive from sustainably managed forests is based on an international framework for “mutual recognition” of national and regional forest certification systems. To date it has endorsed 22 forest certification systems covering 193 million ha of forest in 21 countries. UK Interest in PEFC has grown rapidly and William Walker of the PEFC UK secretariat describes it as an “exciting time” for the scheme. “PEFC has now come of age,” he said. “The level of enquiries has grown from a trickle only 18 months ago to a constant stream.” Walker highlights the impact of the UK government’s latest timber procurement policy, demanding that all timber used in public sector contracts comes from verified legal and, preferably sustainable sources. PEFC-certified timber is recognised by the UK government’s Central Point of Expertise on Timber (CPET) as meeting its for “legal and sustainable” criteria. Using PEFC-certified timber also contributes significantly to getting improved BREEAM ratings. Following the recent positive assessment of the scheme by CPET, supporters of PEFC seem confident that BRE will soon amend the “responsible sourcing” section of the BREEAM standard to give it parity with other forest certification schemes, notably the FSC. National forest certification schemes endorsed by PEFC have to conform to detailed technical requirements. One is that forest certification standards must be aligned with inter-governmental principles for sustainable forest management developed for various regions of the world. For example, standards developed for European forests are aligned to the guidelines for sustainable forestry agreed by European governments.
The TTF estimates that 37% of softwood imported into the UK in 2005 was PEFC certified PEFC-endorsed national forest certification standards must also be based on a consensus-building process with all local stakeholders in accordance with the rules set out in ISO Guide 59. To use the internationally registered PEFC logo, companies must conform to chain of custody standards . The scheme demands that both forest operations and chain of custody are assessed by independent third-party certification bodies operating to ISO rules. And they must be recognised by national accreditation bodies, such as UKAS in the UK. As a result of widespread PEFC certification in Finland and Sweden, significant volumes of PEFC-certified softwood products are readily available in the UK. In fact, the Timber Trade Federation (TTF) estimates that as much as 37% of the 7.6 million m3 of softwood sawn lumber imported into the UK in 2005 was PEFC certified. And 29% of softwood plywood imports into the UK also carried the PEFC logo. ![]() The PEFC trademark can be used by companies that confirm to chain of custody standards PEFC-certified hardwood has been less readily available, although this is beginning to change. According to the TTF , only 3.6% of UK imports of sawn hardwood were certified to PEFC schemes in 2005, all of it from European and Canadian forests. But more recently, UK traders report that German and French hardwood suppliers have been supplying PEFC-certified oak and beech as standard with no price premium. Reflecting the growth in supplies the number of PEFC chain of custody certificates issued in the UK has risen from around 50 two years ago to 350 today. At present no UK domestic forests are PEFC certified. This reflects the decision in 1998 by the UK Forestry Commission (FC) to pursue certification through the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) framework. So wood products sourced primarily from domestic forests – notably panel products such as MDF, OSB and chipboard - are not readily available PEFC-certified. |
Archives
Calendar
Poll
Is timber well placed to benefit from the opportunities presented by the London 2012 Olympics? |